But while salvation is explicitly taught as derived from the eternal election, the further conclusion is not drawn that destruction is also based upon a corresponding decree of doom.1Here Brunner argues passionately, though not coherently, for “single” predestination. in all its fullness to as many people as possible. Both viewpoints include the fall in God’s decree.
God works regeneration monergistically but never sin. The Bible teaches that all salvation is based on the … Consider the implications. In this view the biblicalThe negative act includes two, both preterition, by which in the election of some as well to glory as to grace, he neglected and slighted others, which is evident from the event of election, andThe importance of viewing the decree of reprobation in light of the fall is seen in the on-going discussions between Reformed theologians concerning infra-and supra-lapsarianism.
Even It is one thing to construct a theology of election (or any other kind of theology) purely on the basis of rational speculation.
The Bible teaches that all salvation is based on the eternal Election of God in Jesus Christ, and that this eternal Election springs wholly and entirely from God’s sovereign freedom.
Only by considering election and reprobation as being asymmetrical in terms of a positive-negative schema can God be exonerated from injustice.By a brief reconnaissance of Reformed confessions and by a brief roll-call of the theologians of the Reformed faith, we can readily see that double predestination has been consistently maintained along the lines of a positive-negative schema.Our salvation is from God, but from ourselves there is nothing but sin and damnation. In this context, double predestination is “avoided” (or evaded) by the dialectical method.
Even in the case of the “hardening” of the sinners’ already recalcitrant hearts, God does not, as Luther stated, “work evil in us (for hardening is working evil) by creating fresh evil in us.”2 Luther continued:When men hear us say that God works both good and evil in us, and that we are subject to God’s working by mere passive necessity, they seem to imagine a man who is in himself good, and not evil, having an evil work wrought in him by God; for they do not sufficiently bear in mind how incessantly active God is in all His creatures, allowing none of them to keep holiday. God shows mercy sovereignly and unconditionally to some, and gives justice to those passed over in election.
He says:The Bible does not contain the doctrine of double predestination, although in a few isolated passages it seems to come close to it.
must be precisely the same as the way in which he brings the reprobate to damnation. The asymmetrical expression of the “double” aspect has been clearly maintained. predestination makes God the author of sin, and is utterly unbiblical.âAs God hath appointed the elect unto glory, so hath He, by the eternal and most free purpose of His
In this view predestination is double in that it involves both election and reprobation but is not symmetrical with respect to the mode of divine activity. Many people equate “Calvinism” with the doctrine of double predestination, when there was much more to the man than these teachings. Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree....Reformed and Presbyterian churches: The sovereignty of God and double predestinationThere has been no argument in Reformed theology about the positive side of the doctrine of predestination concerning the election of those...
The first theme is the righteousness of God.